Research Report: Life Cycle Costs Matter When Comparing Steel and Concrete Girder Bridges

As a bridge engineer, professor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Wyoming, and a member of the Short Span Steel Bridge Alliance’s Bridge Technology Center, Michael Barker, Ph.D., P.E., makes frequent presentations on the economics of short span bridge design to county engineers, state Department of Transportation (DOT) engineers and bridge owners.

Over the years, he has received numerous questions about Life Service and Life Cycle Costs, especially concerning steel and concrete girder bridges. His answers were always anecdotal, as research didn’t exist―until now.With a keen interest in finding answers to these persistent questions, Dr. Barker took a sabbatical from the university to conduct his own research.

He started with a comprehensive inventory of bridges and consideration of initial costs and installation dates, maintenance costs and timing, and end-of-service dates. After considering the availability of historical data, he narrowed the scope of research to include initial costs, future costs, and service lives of 1,186 typical steel and concrete state bridges in Pennsylvania built between 1960 and 2010.

Cost Analysis of Steel vs Concrete Bridge

Cost Analysis of Steel vs Concrete Bridge

A portion of Dr. Barker’s research focused on short-length bridges of 140 feet or less, which make up approximately half of the U.S. inventory that needs to be repaired or replaced. The research examined costs with respect to variability in bridge type, span length, number of spans, and bridge life. Typical bridges are defined in the study as those with concrete decks supported by steel rolled beams, steel plate girders, precast concrete boxes, or precast concrete beams.

Working from Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) historical records, he developed a database to determine and compare the life cycle costs of steel and concrete girder bridges. More detailed information on the parameters of the research and determination of values for life cycle costs are included in video (top of this post).

For the short-length bridges included in the PennDOT database, the research demonstrated:

  • The steel I-beam had the longest life.
  • The steel I-beam had the lowest cost.
  • Steel bridges have lower future costs compared to initial costs.
  • None of the bridges clearly beat out the others, meaning any one type of bridge may be the most economical for a given bridge project.

Overall Results
After analyzing the extensive data collected, Dr. Barker concludes:

  • Typical steel and concrete bridges are competitive on initial costs, future costs, life cycle costs and bridge life.
  • For any given bridge project, steel or concrete bridge types may be the most economical. Therefore,
  • Owners should consider both steel and concrete alternatives for individual bridge projects.

The research results do not provide a clear preference for either material. However, the results clearly disprove generally accepted assumptions by bridge engineers that concrete girder bridges are the least-cost solution for every short span project.

It is clear from the research that bridge owners and design professionals who want to find the most economical and long-lasting solutions for repairing and replacing their bridge inventories should conduct a thorough cost analysis that considers the potential benefits of steel and concrete options. Conducting the analysis upfront could save thousands of dollars down the road in maintenance and repair costs.

To download the complete report, “Historical Life Cycle Costs of Steel and Concrete Girder Bridges,” click here.

To download the Fact Sheet, click here.

For more information, contact Dr. Barker at Barker@uwyo.edu.

Related Resources: Economics

Minnesota LTPA Webinar 2025 Short Span steel Bridges

Steel Bridges for Smarter, Faster Construction – On-Demand Steel Bridge Video Series

This three-part on-demand video series covers integral abutments, simple for dead continuous for live designs and prefabricated bridge options.

Bridges of Franklin County: Why Missouri is Turning to Steel weathering steel short span bridge

Bridges of Franklin County: Why Missouri is Turning to Steel

Franklin County, Missouri, saved $283,000 by selecting steel over concrete for four short-span bridge projects, demonstrating that simplified designs combined with a competitive bidding process can deliver exceptional value, durability and long-term performance.

galvanized short span steel bridge mercer county pennsylvania

Pennsylvania County Selects Hot-Dip Galvanized Steel for Urgent Bridge Project

For a recent bridge replacement, Mercer County chose a hot-dip galvanized steel bridge to ensure a durable, cost-effective solution that could be delivered quickly and withstand a corrosive environment.

Whitman County Steel Bridge

Whitman County Saves 32 Percent with Steel Superstructure

By choosing a steel beam girder bridge, the county reduced the overall project costs and decreased the time for construction.

TRIP Rural Bridge Report 2024

Report Finds $198 billion Needed to Repair America’s Rural Transportation System

A new report from TRIP indicates the U.S. faces a $198 billion backlog in funding for needed repairs and improvements to the rural transportation system.

NCSPA Image 1

NCSPA Project Spotlight: Corrugated Steel Used for Culvert Rehabilitation Project

The National Corrugated Steel Pipe Association (NCSPA) spotlights a project that used galvanized corrugated metal pipe to rehabilitate a damaged culvert.